Posted on November 18, 2008 in The Law, Opinion, politics by adminNo Comments »

stop and gostop and gostop and gostop and gostop and gostop and gostop and gostop and gostop and gostop and gostop and gostop and go

     There are plenty of questions as to the validity of presidential hopeful Barack Obama. Allegations have been put out on the table that Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen, in which case it’s against the law for him to be President. From my understanding of this, it’s not against the law for him to run, but it is against the law for him to BE President.

     His past has been shrouded in secrecy right along and so there are many unanswered questions. This blog entry will involve some of these allegations and some of the talk that surround them.

     One of the allegations is that Obama is not a Christian at all, that he’s actually a Muslim as his father was a Muslim. That in and of itself is not a bad thing, but what is bad is that if it’s true, Obama has lied to the American people. If he lied this time, how many other times has he lied?

     Someone has made the allegation that he’s going to change more than just the way the federal gov’t does business. See for yourself:I had heard there was a lawsuit against Obama in Pennsylvania and one of our readers, actually a friend of the owner of Tpromo, sent the following in for your review…

Judge tosses lawsuit challenging Obama citizenship

Oct 25, 3:37 PM (ET)

PHILADELPHIA (AP) - A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s qualifications to be president.

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick on Friday night rejected the suit by attorney Philip J. Berg, who alleged that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency. Berg claimed that Obama is either a citizen of his father’s native Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia after he moved there as a boy.

Obama was born in Hawaii to an American mother and a Kenyan father. His parents divorced and his mother married an Indonesian man.

Internet-fueled conspiracy theories question whether Obama is a “natural-born citizen” as required by the Constitution for a presidential candidate and whether he lost his citizenship while living abroad.

Surrick ruled that Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was “too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters.”

From one of our readers:

Did you notice that the Judge said that Berg lacked standing to bring the case… (read the last sentence) and did not say there was insufficient evidence. Obama’s Presidency, of course, affects each and every one of us. Besides, the Constitution says that the President must be and U.S. citizen and born in this country. What part of the Constitution does this idiot of a judge not understand? This tells me that he is in collusion with the Obama takeover of this country. America is in dire straits!

Posted on November 14, 2008 in Election '08, The Law, Gov't, Opinion, politics by adminNo Comments »

Warning!
me, Albert     The issue of legitimacy or the lack thereof surrounding Barack Obama’s election as President of the United States continues to haunt the back halls of Congress and the dark recesses of the Obama camp. In the shadows of truth lerks the answer to the question, “Is Barack Obama eligible to be President of the United States of America?”

     There are those who believe that Obama is not a native born citizen of the US. Comrad Citizen Wells of www.citizenwells.wordpress.com is one of those truth seekers who are willing to stand up and be counted on this issue:

     ”Barack Obama is not eligible to be president. He was born in Kenya and became an Indonesian citizen. Obama is still Indonesian and is an illegal alien. There is ample proof of this and more is being revealed. Obama has failed to repudiate these facts.”

     Evidently there is plenty of doubt to go round as a number of individuals from a collection of backgrounds are working on the legal front to stop him from taking office in January, 2009.
white graphic
news flash

‘Constitutional crisis’ looming over Obama’s birth location

     The California secretary of state should refuse to allow the state’s 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until President-elect Barack Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office, alleges a California court petition filed on behalf of former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others.

     The legal action today is just the latest is a series of challenges, some of which have gone as high as the U.S. Supreme Court, over the issue of Obama’s status as a “natural-born citizen,” a requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

     WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama’s birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

     The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn’t ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

     HOT

     I, Albert, believe that if these allegations are true and the courts allow Barack Obama to take office in January, there will be no hope for America. First and above all else, the courts who hear these cases and fail to act will lose all credibility in the eyes of all just and truthful citizens. Secondly, never more will anyone be able to trust American government to do what’s right under the law.

     This is where we’ll see what the US courts are truly made of.

     Yours, Albert

Posted on November 10, 2008 in Globalism, History, The Law, Economics, Business, Gov't, politics by adminNo Comments »

Warning!

Fed refuses to identify who got $2 TRILLION in loans

     Defying the will of Congress that emergency loans be transparent, the federal reserve bank is refusing to identify who got almost two TRILLION dollars in loans and what security or collateral was put up to secure those loans.

     Two trillion dollars of US taxpayer money has gone out the door and no one but the fed knows who got it!

     I warned back in March of this year that the USA was going to have a financial meltdown in September and it happened. I also warned in March of this year that the federal government would financially collapse by February of 2009.

     With nonsense like this two trillion debacle making headlines, look for a US government financial collapse very soon. The world will not tolerate the printing of money and will, in short order, rebuke our currency.

Do you dare read more?
     How can you not?

     If you want my opinion, we’re in for one heck of a ride, and very soon. I, Albert, knew as soon as they “bailed out” the financial institutions that what they were really doing is working to attain a given result within a given time frame. The collapse of our economy in Sept. and the subsequent failure of our dollar in Feb 09 is not new info. I carried it on the Albertaclipper Blog some time ago.

     If you have any sense about you, you’ll listen to what Hal Turner has to say about the oncoming North American Union. How hungry will you get before you listen to what’s being told to you by people who know what the score is? How long will you continue to make fun of these people who constantly put their lives on the line to help you until you stop and listen? How many good men, women and children will die before you understand who the true enemny of freedom is?

     Listen to what’s ahead of us and ask yourself what you can do to stop it? Listen Now! It may very well be too late, but at least you’ll know what’s coming before it gets here!

     Yours, Albert

Posted on November 8, 2008 in Globalism, politics by adminNo Comments »

news flash

Palin denounces anonymous critics as ‘cowardly’

     ANCHORAGE, Alaska – Gov. Sarah Palin denounced anonymous criticisms leveled at her by former John McCain aides as lies, including allegations that Republican lawyers were traveling to Alaska to reclaim her high-priced wardrobe and that she didn’t know Africa was a continent.

     ”Those accounts are not true,” the former Republican vice presidential candidate said in her first public comments on the matter since the election Tuesday.

     Palin returned Friday to her Anchorage governor’s office and said she had no immediate plans to build on her newfound national name-recognition and popularity with the Republican base for a possible 2012 presidential run. HOT

     We live in a country where we should know our accuser. Sarah is right on the money here, whom ever is making these totally ridiculous accusations is nothing me, Albertbut a coward. Some of the comments that the “popular” press has made regarding Palin is downright laughable, but they’re made at her expense.

     Frankly, Palin has integrity and class. If it’s McCain’s camp that is putting out these moronic comments, then it causes me to wonder if the “powers that be” own McCain as well as Obama. After all, they may have selected Palin because they expected her to faulter and fall, but she didn’t. In fact, I’m sure she shocked them into the realization that she could very well be a serious problem for them in 2012 if she should decide to run for President.

      Do you get the picture here? They’re trashing her now so you morons won’t think of her as a class act in 2010 when the 2012 election begins.
     The sad little men who sit in high places are obviously behind this, otherwise the media that they largely own would never stoop to this kind of tactic. The question is, are you morons who listen to this stuff smart enough to figure this out? I suggest you wake up and take a good look around you. Get your narrow little heads out of the TV for a change and stop listening and believing everything you’re told by the other morons who spout this nonsense.

     Yours, Albert

Posted on November 6, 2008 in The Law, The Family, Opinion, politics by adminNo Comments »

warning, special breaking news

Calif. gay-marriage ban creates legal uncertainty

     SAN FRANCISCO – An estimated 1,000 protesters took to the streets over California’s new ban on gay marriage Thursday as the political turmoil and legal confusion over who should have the right to wed deepened.

     Legal experts said it is unclear whether an attempt by gay-rights activists to overturn the prohibition has any chance of success, and whether the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed in California over the past four months are in any danger.

You Gotta Read This Now!!

Warning!Get Real

All I can say is these gay guys should go get a wife, I mean a life!

     It’s about time the people of this nation get back to the original design criteria that God, the Master Creator, instituted when time on Earth began. Bravo, Californians! About time!

     Yours, Albert

Posted on November 3, 2008 in Globalism, Gov't, Opinion, politics by adminNo Comments »

nobama.jpg

     Why doesn`t Obama provide his birth certificate? Is he a natural-born citizen, or not? Does he qualify to be President? Obama! Show us your birth certificate!     

Qualifications for the Office of President

     Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1

     No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

     Term limit amendment - US Constitution, Amendment XXII, Section 1 – ratified February 27, 1951 

     No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. 
 

     Want to read more? Go to: http://comments.obamacrimes.com!

me, Albert
     I, Albert, will give you my two cents worth here… the “powers that be” responsible for putting Obama where he is today is counting on the fact that YOU WILL NOT DEMAND HIS IMMEDIATE DISMISSAL BY CONGRESS!

     That’s right, once he’s elected they are counting on Congress NOT to remove him, even when they know, yes, THEY ALREADY KNOW that he is not a legitimate candidate!!!

     How do I, Albert, know this? Because if Obama were a legitimate candidate he would have already coughed up his birth certificate. He’s not eligible! I’ll bet you he’s not! And so this is such a scam against the American people that it isn’t fully comprehended by most. Once elected, they know that the authorities won’t remove him 1) because they’ve been ordered not to perhaps, or 2) perhaps they would be afraid of the backlash that would occur from blacks across the nation.  What a scam!

     If the American people elect this man president, THEY WILL DESERVE WHAT THEY GET!

     Yours, Albert

Posted on November 3, 2008 in Announcements by adminNo Comments »

nobama.jpg

From one of our loyal readers:


 A Google search revealed that Snopes.com is owned by David and Barbara Mikkelson, who live in Southern California and are Obama supporters. An interested reader (unknown to me) suspected that Snopes had a liberal bias after discovering several “half-truths” and distortions.

Compare their analysis of the Obama/Ayers connection with truthorfiction.com’s analysis of the same subject. Snopes minimizes the connection, categorizing the rumor as a “Partial Truth,” while truthorfiction calls it a “Truth” and, in fact, references a CNN expose of the two, as well as a Wall Street Journal article about their connection. Snopes not only does not reference either source cited above, but instead, lists a quote from an Obama spokesman as its main source.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/ayers.asp

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/o/obama-ayers.htm

Another comparison of Snopes vs. Truthorfiction is their treatment of the email regarding “Obama’s 50 lies.” Snopes adds editorial comments favoring Obama on unproven statements or even on proven ones where the comments are that he is “taken out of context.”

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/50lies.asp

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/o/obama-lies.htm

There are other things that they list as false, even though Youtube has videos of Obama or others actually making the statements.

Seems Snopes has a liberal agenda andhttp://www.truthorfiction.com/
might be a better, unbiased source.

Posted on October 30, 2008 in Election '08, politics by adminNo Comments »

Stop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, go

nobama.jpg

When Obama talks about “spreading the wealth,” he’s talking Socialism. There is no two ways about it, Obama stands for Socialism, and that usually ends up becoming Communism, and we have all seen the dire result of this form of government on its people. Those of you who are too young to remember, take my word for it, please. You do not want a Communist or a Socialist in the White House! If you do, why don’t you go to Russia to live, or to France. This is America, so please go away and leave us alone.

Yours, Albert

Posted on October 30, 2008 in Election '08, politics by adminNo Comments »

nobama.jpg

Training a Socialist Army of World Servers

“These are serious times,” Barack Obama said recently. “And they call for a serious debate about where we need to take the nation.”[5] That’s true! So where does he want “to take our nation?” How does his version of “service” fit his vision of CHANGE? And what will it cost in terms of freedom, privacy, taxes, and government control?

There’s nothing wrong with the old voluntary, personal service to the poor and needy. For centuries, Christian missionaries have given their lives and comforts to serve God among the sick, hungry and dying people in distant parts of the world. Others have shown the same God-given compassion in their own communities. They demonstrated His love, shared His life-saving Truths, and brought hope as well as help to the needy.

Obama’s plan is radically different. Aimed at socialist change, it would raise “religious” boundaries, limit free speech, and ban divisive truths. It must be tolerant of today’s amoral values and militantly intolerant toward traditional values. And — like the tactics outlined in Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” — it would use deception and “agitation” to create conflict, and the Hegelian/Marxist dialectic process to manipulate minds and establish the planned solidarity.[6]

Obama learned it all during his years as “Community Organizer” in Chicago.

You Need To Read This Now!

Posted on October 30, 2008 in Election '08, politics by adminNo Comments »

nobama.jpg

The Socialist State of America

Obama has promised “change”, and, if elected, he’ll make sure we get it. The result of his “change” will be that you won’t have any paper money in your pockets — all you’ll have is change. If you think we have economic problems, wait until you see the changes Obama’s Socialism will bring to America. (For a preview, consider the devastation Obama-style economic “reform” brought to Russia: economic ruin, complete with bread lines.)

Why am I talking about Socialism? Everyone knows that this election is about the economy, right? Not really. It’s about MONEY. Following this election, either Capitalism or Socialism will control the economy, and thus the money.

Guess who got the money after the Russian Revolution? The Communist Party leaders. Sure, they gave wonderful speeches about how the ordinary comrade in the streets would have more money after their Glorious Revolution. But we all know what happened. The comrades were soon starving in the streets. And the party leaders were living in luxury.

Read it here!

Next Page »