me, Albert     There’s been a lot of talk about Barack Hussein Obama not being a native born citizen of the United States. Those who say this also say that he’s not qualified for this reason. What does it matter if Obama’s not a native born American anyway?

     Here’s why you and I ought to care: Within Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, it says, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

     This LAW many not be much of a concern in a country where its citizens don’t really care enough about the law to stop at stop signs, but to a people who realize the necessity and value of following laws, it should mean a lot. Okay, so let’s get beyond the birth certificate thing and let’s focus more on what and whom the 44th President is.

     If you’re black, he’s a black man of great success. If you’re a Muslim, then he’s a successful Arab. Can he be both at the same time? And if he happens to be Muslim, how is that a bad thing for the United States?

muslim_flag1.jpg     Pamela Geller, publisher of AtlasShrugs.com and author of the new book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America, says this most recent comment by Obama has been ignored by the mainstream media and should be of great concern to U.S. citizens.

     Pam Geller (Freedom Defense Initiative)”[In] this latest report…Foreign Prime Minister Gheit on Nile Television…said that, in confidence, Obama told him that he was a Muslim,” says Geller, “and that after he straightened out domestic issues would show the Muslim world how to handle Israel.”

     Geller also says that while this topic is nothing new, it is further evidence of Obama’s sympathetic tendencies towards those who mean harm to the U.S. and his intent to reshape America’s religious foundation.

     You gotta read this!

     Jesus Christ once said that it will be by people’s acts that we will ultimately know who they really are. A man can say he’s this or he can profess to say he’s that, but in the end analysis, he could be something entirely different. As they say, time will tell and the outcome will be just as telling.

     Yours, Albert

Posted on January 31, 2010 in Election '08, Racial Issues, Gov't, Opinion, politics by adminNo Comments »

me, Albert     It’s been awhile since I’ve posted to the Albertaclipper blog, November 22nd of last year to be exact. During this time I’ve been watching and listening to our new president in the hope of coming to some conclusion as to who and what he may be.

     The one thing I do believe is that President Obama is sincere about what he does. He goes after what he wants with a passion unseen in any president in decades, other than President Bush, Jr., on the heels of September 11th, but it’s also my belief that a man can be sincere and yet be sincerely wrong.

     Ok, so we know that a man can be passionate about something and be wrong at the same time, and there are those who say that he’s deliberately nixing the economy and that he’ll end up destroying this country. Whether he does or not is yet to be seen, but the one thing I do know is that his man is dead set to finish what he started and he’s on a mission. In fact, it’s my belief that President Obama was born to this task and it’s his destiny to see it to the end. As to what that mission is, I can only guess.

     No, I’m not in favor of universal healthcare run by a government that can barely run themselves, and it’s for sure that most of them refuse to include their own selves in the equation when it would make perfect sense to include all Federal employees in it so it’s even more affordable, but no, they will not do that and it’s this one fact, this single issue that convinces me that there’s something wrong with this effort in Congress.

     And then there’s the issue of small arms in the United States. I’ve been hearing some rumblings about an upcoming effort to sign a United Nations treaty that will ban small arms here in the U.S. Likewise I’ve heard rumblings that President Obama is on board with this effort. Here is an example taken from another website (http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/barack_obama_gun_control.htm):

Opposed bill okaying illegal gun use in home invasions
     Hale DeMar, a 52-year-old Wilmette resident, was arrested and charged with misdemeanor violations for shooting, in the shoulder and leg, a burglar who broke into his home not once, but twice. Cook County prosecutors dropped all charges against DeMar.

     In March 2004, the Illinois Senate passed Senate Bill 2165, a law introduced in response to DeMar’s case, with provisions designed to assert a right of citizens to protect themselves against home invasions, such that self-defense requirements would be viewed to take precedence over local ordinances against handgun possession. The measure passed the Illinois Senate by a vote of 38-20. Barack Obama was one of the 20 state senators voting against the measure.

     Governor Rod Blagojevich vetoed the bill. On Nov. 9, 2004, the Illinois Senate voted 40-18 to override Blagojevich’s veto. Again, Obama acted against the bill.

     On Nov. 17, the Illinois House voted overwhelmingly, 85-30, to override the governor’s veto and Senate Bill 2165 became law.

     Source: Obama Nation, by Jerome Corsi, p.241-242 Aug 1, 2008

     I also believe that the enormously, shockingly change of parties in a recent Senatorial race in Mass. is also evidence that the people of this nation have decided that the Democrat party in general has botched the job before them. And now that they have both houses, you’d think they would have been able to do more. This shows that even within the Democrat party there are those who do not agree with the extreme left slant that has taken place since this president took office.

     Alright, I must also mention the issue of money, banks, and auto companies while I’m at it. No, I do not agree with the philosophy used in the bank bailouts, the purchase of GM and the demise of Chrysler as it was. It is obvious to me that this president as well as those who sit under him believe that government is able to solve what the free market cannot, and I do not believe that this is correct.

     After taking a hard look at what’s going on out there, I, Albert, must conclude that I cannot in good conscience vote Democrat in the next election. That’s my opinion and I’ll be sticking to it.

     Yours, Albert

me, Albert     When some of us voted for President Obama we did so expecting big changes in government. And boy, he is going to do just that. Today, Fox News replayed one of Obama’s recent talks to the American people.

     The jest of what he had to say was this: “You wanted things to change in this country when you elected me, and now I’m going to give you big just that, big wide sweeping changes!”

     Let’s consider some of the things that Americans may have thought about when he campaigned on that platform…

  • Lower taxes

  • Less government
  • More compassion in government
  • More accountability in the White House
  • True protection of U.S. Borders
  •      These are some of the things that come to mind when I think about changes in government and I’m sure that many of those who helped Obama get in thought he meant some of these. Instead, from his conversations on the television, it appears they’re going to get:

  • Higher taxes

  • More government
  • Less compassion
  • Less accountability at the top
  • Inadequate protection on the borders
  •      Obama, through the massive monetary give-a-ways, will have to raise taxes and he’s already said that. He’s saying he’s gonig to tax the rich, so they’ll leave the United States just in time to see it sink. He’ll have no where else to turn but you and I for the money, and that’s where 2 comes in. Here he’ll grow government to massive proportions, eventually taking your homes in order to get it.

         I have no idea why the general public is unable to see through all of this. I suppose that you, personally, yes, you… the radical lefty reading this, won’t care about any of this as long as you get to keep the house you really can’t afford to pay for AND someone else, some rich folks no less, are made to pay for it.

         Don’t you idiots know that if you and I allow any sitting government to roll over top of any one of us, we’re in line eventually to have the same thing happen to us. Don’t you realize that it’s the modus operandi of the Communist to create a race problem, to focus our attention on class issues, and to join minorities into majorities so they can destroy the true and rightful majority?

         Anything less than “one for all and all for one” is no less than inadequate at combating and successfully solving the problems we now see before us? If you want change, boy, you’re going to get it, whether you like it or not, and chances are, you’re not.

         There’s a sucker born every day, and boy America has its share of them!

         Yours, Albert

    Posted on January 31, 2009 in Election '08, The Law, Gov't, Announcements by adminNo Comments »

    Congress sued to remove prez from White House

    © 2009 WorldNetDaily
    white graphic
    A new lawsuit is challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and this one targets Congress as a defendant for its “failure” to uphold the constitutional demand to make sure Obama qualified before approving the Electoral College vote that actually designated him as the occupant of the Oval Office.
    white graphic
    The new case raises many of the same arguments as dozens of other cases that have flooded into courtrooms around the nation since the November election.
    white graphic
    It is being brought on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. and names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
    white graphic
    Where’s the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the “natural-born American” clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 193,000 others and sign up now!
    white graphic
    As WND has reported, dozens of lawsuits have been filed over Obama’s eligibility to assume the office of the president. Many have been dismissed while others remain pending.

    READ IT NOW!

         I, Albert, must say that if it is true that President Obama is not a native-born American, then Congress really has no choice but to remove him. If they fail to do so, that would instantly transform them into criminals as each of them swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution, which clearly says that a sitting President must be native born! What part of NATIVE BORN does Congress fail to understand?

         A co-worker questioned the notion that Obama doesn’t quality as President, as do I, even still. But, from what I, Albert, understand, no one has produced an US birth certificate for President Obama, not even Obama himself. Now, why doesn’t he just up and up-chuck one so we can all put this issue to rest–but he hasn’t. He could have, he’s had ample opportunity, but he’s refused to do it, or he can’t. Either way, he’s in big trouble if the “rule of Law” is followed on this issue.

         Here are some past blog entries for you to munch on. Let’s hope Congress gets some baseballs on this and that they investigate and put to rest this birth certificate issue. Or, if they find he was not born in the US, then they know what they have to do. I don’t care if he’s blue or pink, they have to remove him from office… It’s Law!

         Yours, Albert

         Similiar stories on the Albertaclipper Blog:
    Supreme Court: Donofrio v Obama Citizenship Issue
    Blog Reader Says Philadelphia Judge In Bed With Obama
    Obama’s Place Of Birth Is Still In Question
    The Question Is: Does Obama Qualify To Be President?
    Do U Really Know Obama? Are U Sure U do?
    The Illegal Candidate?
    Accusations Against Obama

    Posted on December 11, 2008 in Election '08, Globalism, Gov't, Opinion, Education, politics by KeithNo Comments »

    halfmast.gifA soldier who is serving his fourth deployment to Afghanistan called talk show host Rusty Humphrey last night while home on leave.

     

    When the subject of the election of Barck Hussein Obama was brought up by the host,  the soldier reported that the consensus of opinion among our American troops is that the voters have given the U.S. military a big “SLAP IN THE FACE!”

     

    Many of the ignorant masses have no idea what damage they have done to our nation. But our leftist DemocRAT enemies know exactly what they have engineered. The destruction of our republic!

     

    After decades of the left-wing indoctrination of our school children and college students, the communist’s mission was almost complete when Obama and the DemocRATS were allowed to steal the election.  But they realized that they also must now demoralize our military troops; otherwise, they risk the chance of a military coupe against their socialist government that has now taken all but complete control over us!

     

    Those of you who are over the age of 50, take some time to ponder as you look at your Christmas cards and the 1940’s movies on TV this season which display an America we used to know. Then ask yourself, how did we allow all this to slip away? Could I have personally done something more to have preserved this near-perfect republic that would have denied our enemies their victory over us?

     

    Don’t bother to ask yourself if it is too late to do something about this now, because sadly enough, we all know the answer to that question.

     

     

    Keith

    Posted on November 14, 2008 in Election '08, The Law, Gov't, Opinion, politics by adminNo Comments »

    Warning!
    me, Albert     The issue of legitimacy or the lack thereof surrounding Barack Obama’s election as President of the United States continues to haunt the back halls of Congress and the dark recesses of the Obama camp. In the shadows of truth lerks the answer to the question, “Is Barack Obama eligible to be President of the United States of America?”

         There are those who believe that Obama is not a native born citizen of the US. Comrad Citizen Wells of www.citizenwells.wordpress.com is one of those truth seekers who are willing to stand up and be counted on this issue:

         ”Barack Obama is not eligible to be president. He was born in Kenya and became an Indonesian citizen. Obama is still Indonesian and is an illegal alien. There is ample proof of this and more is being revealed. Obama has failed to repudiate these facts.”

         Evidently there is plenty of doubt to go round as a number of individuals from a collection of backgrounds are working on the legal front to stop him from taking office in January, 2009.
    white graphic
    news flash

    ‘Constitutional crisis’ looming over Obama’s birth location

         The California secretary of state should refuse to allow the state’s 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until President-elect Barack Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office, alleges a California court petition filed on behalf of former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others.

         The legal action today is just the latest is a series of challenges, some of which have gone as high as the U.S. Supreme Court, over the issue of Obama’s status as a “natural-born citizen,” a requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

         WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama’s birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

         The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn’t ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

         HOT

         I, Albert, believe that if these allegations are true and the courts allow Barack Obama to take office in January, there will be no hope for America. First and above all else, the courts who hear these cases and fail to act will lose all credibility in the eyes of all just and truthful citizens. Secondly, never more will anyone be able to trust American government to do what’s right under the law.

         This is where we’ll see what the US courts are truly made of.

         Yours, Albert

    Posted on October 30, 2008 in Election '08, politics by adminNo Comments »

    Stop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, goStop, caution, go

    nobama.jpg

    When Obama talks about “spreading the wealth,” he’s talking Socialism. There is no two ways about it, Obama stands for Socialism, and that usually ends up becoming Communism, and we have all seen the dire result of this form of government on its people. Those of you who are too young to remember, take my word for it, please. You do not want a Communist or a Socialist in the White House! If you do, why don’t you go to Russia to live, or to France. This is America, so please go away and leave us alone.

    Yours, Albert

    Posted on October 30, 2008 in Election '08, politics by adminNo Comments »

    nobama.jpg

    Training a Socialist Army of World Servers

    “These are serious times,” Barack Obama said recently. “And they call for a serious debate about where we need to take the nation.”[5] That’s true! So where does he want “to take our nation?” How does his version of “service” fit his vision of CHANGE? And what will it cost in terms of freedom, privacy, taxes, and government control?

    There’s nothing wrong with the old voluntary, personal service to the poor and needy. For centuries, Christian missionaries have given their lives and comforts to serve God among the sick, hungry and dying people in distant parts of the world. Others have shown the same God-given compassion in their own communities. They demonstrated His love, shared His life-saving Truths, and brought hope as well as help to the needy.

    Obama’s plan is radically different. Aimed at socialist change, it would raise “religious” boundaries, limit free speech, and ban divisive truths. It must be tolerant of today’s amoral values and militantly intolerant toward traditional values. And — like the tactics outlined in Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” — it would use deception and “agitation” to create conflict, and the Hegelian/Marxist dialectic process to manipulate minds and establish the planned solidarity.[6]

    Obama learned it all during his years as “Community Organizer” in Chicago.

    You Need To Read This Now!

    Posted on October 30, 2008 in Election '08, politics by adminNo Comments »

    nobama.jpg

    The Socialist State of America

    Obama has promised “change”, and, if elected, he’ll make sure we get it. The result of his “change” will be that you won’t have any paper money in your pockets — all you’ll have is change. If you think we have economic problems, wait until you see the changes Obama’s Socialism will bring to America. (For a preview, consider the devastation Obama-style economic “reform” brought to Russia: economic ruin, complete with bread lines.)

    Why am I talking about Socialism? Everyone knows that this election is about the economy, right? Not really. It’s about MONEY. Following this election, either Capitalism or Socialism will control the economy, and thus the money.

    Guess who got the money after the Russian Revolution? The Communist Party leaders. Sure, they gave wonderful speeches about how the ordinary comrade in the streets would have more money after their Glorious Revolution. But we all know what happened. The comrades were soon starving in the streets. And the party leaders were living in luxury.

    Read it here!

    Posted on October 19, 2008 in Globalism, Election '08, Gov't, Opinion, politics by Keith1 Comment »

    As everything appears to be falling in place now for the ordination of Barack Hussein Obama as President of the U.S., our only hope of defeating him is in getting the message out, and offering our sincere prayers for America in this time of great need.

    With the mass media, the masses of brain-dead voters, and now the courts siding with the ACORN criminals, it will take a true miracle to keep Obama and all his anti-American friends out of the White House.

    I remember back to the time (before the 2008 primaries) when it was thought that the Clinton political war machine was absolutely unbeatable. But now we see an Obama organization that has accumulated more political clout than any Presidential contender in our nation’s history. The power granted to Obama is not limited to that which he received from his U.S. followers. Barack Hussein Obama has received huge donations from foreign Arab and Muslim coffers… many of which had to have their funds laundered in order to create the impression that the money came from individuals rather than from large wealthy Islamic organizations.

    Although hushed by the mainstream news media, some of Obama’s foreign backers are now bragging about their role in this election. The following item from WorldNet Daily quoted one well-known Mideast leader:

     

    Arab World Campaign Contributions ‘May Enable Him To Win U.S. Presidency’

    But with or without his radical Islamic ties, Obama carries with him a Marxist socialist agenda that goes well beyond the views of the current crop of left-leaning Democrats enjoying their occupation of the U.S. House and Senate. Just think of Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, and multiply their leftist policies by 10!

    The clock is ticking folks. We have only two weeks now until a free America makes its choice at the ballot box.

     

    What will your choice be?

     

     

    Keith

    Next Page »