Posted on February 24, 2008 in Gov't, The Law, Opinion, privacy, Communications, politics by adminNo Comments »

Bush blames Dems on surveillance bill

     WASHINGTON - House Democratic leaders came under criticism Saturday from President Bush who said they are blocking intelligence legislation so lawyers can sue telephone companies for helping the government eavesdrop on suspected terrorists.

     Terrorists are plotting attacks “at this very moment,” Bush said in his weekly radio address. He again urged the House to act on Senate-passed legislation needed to renew the intelligence law that expired last weekend.

     The Senate bill provides retroactive protection for telecommunications companies that wiretapped U.S. phone and computer lines at the government’s request, but without the permission of a secret court created 30 years ago to oversee such activities. The House version does not provide such immunity against lawsuits.
Click Here Now

      Let’s hope that people smarter and more connected to the facts than I, Albert, am do the right thing here. If I were a telephone service provider, I would be very reluctant to comply with any surveillance law. All of this almost sounds like former Nazi Germany in the 20s and 30s.

     Your’s, Albert

     To link your site to this story, use the following HTML:

Posted on February 15, 2008 in The Law, Gov't, privacy, Communications, Announcements by admin1 Comment »

Warning!

Bush warns of attacks while backing bill

     WASHINGTON - President Bush, at loggerheads with House Democrats over how closely the government can eavesdrop on U.S. citizens, warned Wednesday that terrorists were planning fresh assaults that would make the Sept. 11 attacks “pale by comparison.”

     Bush called on the image of planes crashing into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in 2001 as he pressured lawmakers to rewrite the intelligence rules governing how phone calls and e-mails are monitored for terrorist activity. Democrats and others fear the changes Bush and his Republican allies support would unduly encroach on civil liberties.

     The House is considering the Senate version of the bill that Bush favors, one that includes retroactive protection from lawsuits for telecommunications companies that cooperated with government eavesdropping following the Sept. 11 attacks. The House bill does not provide telecom immunity.

click here

     If memory serves me correctly, when this president pitched the idea of a Patriot Act that included warrantless wiretaps, did he not say it was only temporary? Here we are, as most of us knew we would be, contemplating a real world right out of Orwell’s 1984. Big Brother is looking to expand his reach, or so it would seem. Yes, there are bad guys, but there are also good guys.

     A number of years ago I read something that the owner of tpromo.com wrote on one of his websites. He essentially said, “When the cure looks a lot like the disease, it’s time to get rid of the cure.”

     In a sense, he’s right. When the cure requires our gov’t officials to act like criminals, sneaking around in the night spying on us, then you have to wonder if the cure is good for America. Only 15 years ago this kind of thing would be called UnAmerican!

     Where this artice talks about Bush being at odds with Democrats, I heard on the radio yesterday that top Republicans walked out because they’re not happy either. This is one of the most UnAmerican actions on the part of the Federal Gov’t that I believe I’ve ever seen to date. Tell me anything else they’ve done that compares, besides Ruby Ridge and the Waco tragedy.

     Your’s, Albert

     To link your site to this story, use the following HTML:

Posted on January 5, 2008 in Health, Science, privacy, Communications by adminNo Comments »

Did you notice that every now and then everyone you meet seems to be upset, angry, and ready to do battle with the first person they tangle with? There have been days when this phenomena has been so noticable that I’ve had to ask myself, “What’s in the wind here?”

     In the ninties there was a document that circulated among Watchers that told of a plot to utilize the national cellular system to invoke certain effects among the populous. The document told how a single cellular service company that services the vast majority of cell towers across the nation had been recruited for this task.

     The writer of this document alleged that the radio frequency microwave signals coming from these towers would be manipulated in a certain way to create a variety of effects.

     It was also in the nineties that one of the science magazines that circulates told of how microwave radio energy can be made to induce audio directly into the human mind.

     Whether this has taken place or not is anyone’s guess, but it does show that such things are possible when scientists get together. When diabolical individuals recruit the help of science, anything is possible–even Orwell’s 1984, or Huxley’s Brave New World.

     Think about all of this the next time you venture out in the morning and encounter your fair share of angry drivers…

     Your’s, Albert

     To link your site to this story, use the following HTML:

Posted on December 26, 2007 in Economics, The Law, Gov't, Opinion, Communications, privacy, politics by adminNo Comments »

newsflash animated image

     

Canadian Health Agency admits to Major Hack

     Database disasters are not just confined to UK government agencies, after sensitive patient information has been accessed by persons unknown on a Canadian health agency computer.

     According to Health Minister Ross Wiseman, the data, including lab test results for infectious diseases such as HIV and hepatitis along with patient names and health numbers, was stored on a government desktop computer, which was taken to the home of a consultant working for the Provincial Public Health Laboratory.

     click now animated image.

     Here’s another example of how placing critical information on the Internet for all to hack often results in the compromise of valuable personal data. I have to agree with those who disagree with this practice–this makes absolutely no sense. If you know that hacking is a possibility, why on earth would you place critical data on the Internet?

     Are we stupid or what?

     Yours, Albert

     To link your site to this story, use the following HTML:

Posted on December 14, 2007 in Gov't, Opinion, Communications, Business by adminNo Comments »

It’s my opinion that no U.S. citizen should have to press the numeral one (1) in order to speak with a representative based in the United States of America! And yet routinely we see this taking place everywhere you look!

     Perhaps the thing to do is list every major business that does this on a single website, such as the Albertaclipper blog.

     What do you think?

     Hey there, talk with me!

     Your’s, Albert

     To link your site to this story, use the following HTML:

     BOISE, Idaho (AP) - Two Boise elementary schools will be offering dual language programs to students when classes begin next fall. The Boise School Board of Trustees approved the programs earlier this week for Whittier and Whitney elementary schools.

     Under the plan, teachers will provide and English/Spanish program in morning and afternoon kindergarten classes at both schools. Administrators can then expand the programs in subsequent years.


Read It Now!

     I don’t know if you thought of this as I did, but why is there such a big push to institute two languages in the United States? Not only do you see it in the media, but you also see it in schools, which are government institutions. Not only “why”, but “who” is doing this? Who is it that wants the United States to speak Spanish?

     For example, the Ford Foundation commonly works to promote the publication in Spanish:

Creative Communications
(Boise, ID)
$100,000
To pioneer the development of a
Spanish language state news service
in Idaho, Oregon and Washington.

     This is a commonly supported program on the part of the Ford Foundation.

     We all know that charitable organizations, such as the Ford Foundation, are all about helping people. However, the issue of a forced dual language throughout any society does not help that nation. This is because those who come from the outside never quite fit in.

No Speak English, A Life of Drudgery

     The average Spanish-speaking person who comes to this country will also be doomed to a life of drudgery and work. Although those who head up these organizations have every good intention, they empower Spanish-speaking people to remain on the outside of success. You must fluently speak English in the U.S. to be successful in business, work, and in other areas–unless the intent is to make Spanish the main language by virtue of a growing Spanish-speaking population.

     If all of this were to simply remain voluntary and among media and foundation types, that would be one thing. But the fact is, once such a humanitarian effort in the U.S. becomes a standard, then it becomes law. Part of that process involves our courts. Once a number of judgements go in favor of those who promote Spanish as a quasi-official national language, then it becomes the norm, which not only is bad for Spanish-speaking people, but it’s doubly bad for home-grown U.S. citizens.

     

Conservatives Remain Silent as Salvation Army Bears English Language Lawsuit


     (ASHEVILLE, N.C.) - After top Republican Presidential Candidates spent weeks attempting to convince voters that they are the most conservative of the group, all have remained mum on a winning issue for Conservatives: the right of businesses and faith-based organizations to require employees to speak English while on the job.

     My position is clear. English should be made the official language of the United States. English language should be a requirement for citizenship and a requirement in any job where two spoken languages would be a safety or customer service problem. The American people and the conservative leadership have become so worn down by the politically correct police that we cannot even stand in the gap for a Christian organization that does nothing but help others across the globe. What does that say about us and our leaders?


Read It Now!

     If this is allowed to happen, if the Salvation Army loses this court case, you can bet the effects will be so far reaching that you and I have no concept of it. The very idea that a U.S. organization can’t require its employees to speak English well enough to converse with the common English citizen is absolutely nuts.

     Many countries have taken a stand on their own national lanague, why not this country? Who’s stopping this and why are they interfering with what makes good, common sense? Why do supposed conservatives like our current President support anything and everything but their own home-grown people?

     Not a single Top Republican Candidate has publicly weighed in on this issue or expressed support for the Salvation Army, which is currently being sued by the EEOC for requiring its employees to speak English. Yet, 77 percent of Americans agree that businesses have the right to demand their employees speak English while on the clock. Moreover, a summer 2006 Rasmussen poll stated that 85 percent of Americans (92 percent of Republicans and 79 percent of Democrats) believe English should be the official language of the United States.

A Nation Divided

     What about the other 23% of Americans who believe that businesses should be forced to hire employees who can’t speak a lick of English? What has brought them to this point? How is it that they fail to see the obvious–that by not requiring immigrants to eventually learn English we doom them to a somewhat low-grade life of low-grade jobs–unless all of this is about money.

     We know that the media is being heavily used to move the mindset of the American people from a common sense, traditional position to that of a multi-cultural, International flavor of thinking.

     Why is this happening? Who’s behind this push to move Americans leftward from a more conservative, united approach to business, personal relationships, as well as governmental issues? Everyday we’re becoming more and more a nation devided–a nation with divided interests. And we all know that a nation with divided interests is a nation poised to fall. Look at history, such as the ancient Rome.

Big Business

     It’s quite possible that big business is behind this, pushing the issue of allowing a porous border benefits their own pocketbooks because they will continue to have a ready source of low-income workers–workers who come here to improve their lives but only find a life where they–the Mr. and the Mrs.–often have to work two jobs to make ends meet.

     This effort to institute a multi-cultural environment did not happen over night. It began in government as most radial movements do. It began with requiring multiple languages in all U.S. governmental dealings. It involved acceptance in hiring practices, recruitment issues, then in contracts between government and private companies and organizations. For all I know it could have begun with a single presidential executive order.

Let’s Hear From You

     The who, what, when, how, and where may not seem all that important to most of us, but it would answer a lot of questions. If you have any recollections regarding these five elements as it relates to the effort to institute a multi-cultural, dual-language environment in government as well as the private sector, perhaps you’ll be kind enough to leave a comment for the benefit of all.

     To comment, click on the comment link above and to the right (at the beginning of this post), or Click Here. All you have to provide is your name, email and your comment. No registration is required with the Albertaclipper Blog. Give it a try!

     Your’s, Albert

     To link your site to this story, use the following HTML: