I’m all for change when change makes sense, and I’m all for a presidential candidate changing his views every now and again in their lifetimes, but Mr. Obama has changed his views more during this election process than any 50 of us common folks do in a life time.

The following providees a small view of what this largely unknown Senator thinks about the 2nd Amendment:

In addition, from 1998 to 2001, Obama was on the board of directors for the Joyce Foundation, which funded such anti-gun groups as the Violence Policy Center, the Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence, and Handgun Free America. Both the Violence Policy Center and Handgun Free America, as its name suggests, are in favor of a complete ban on handguns. During his tenure on the board, the Joyce Foundation was probably the major funder of pro-control research in the United States.

In fact, I knew Obama during the mid-1990s, and his answers to IVI’s question on guns fit well with the Obama that I knew. Indeed, the first time I introduced myself to him he said “Oh, you are the gun guy.”

I responded “Yes, I guess so.” He simply responded that “I don’t believe that people should be able to own guns.”

By John R. Lott, Jr., author of Obama and Guns: Two Different Views, on Fox News

READ IT HERE!!

It takes a leftist to recognize a lefltist, and I, Albert, will tell you now, this assumed messiah is about as left as you can get. I should know, I was once one. I can also tell you that no one gets to and through the primary like this man did unless “someones” with big pockets are standing behind him. This “someones” threw their other horse under the bus, Hillary, because they think that Mr. Obama is better able to carry on their leftist agendas.

It’s a frightening thought that this assumed messiah may be more left than Hillary was. I’m almost ready to say that I’d rather have her for president than Obama. He scares me simply because no one truly knows his stance on anything. He’s changed his slant so many times on so many things that how could you trust him on anything he says?

The Bible instructs us that if we cannot trust a man in a small thing, how can we trust him in a big thing? I believe this situation qualifies, don’t you?

Yours, Albert

Paid Advertisement

Change can be good… and it can be bad.  If the person proposing changes happens to be a leftist, it’s going to be bad.  On the other hand, if this person is a far Rightist, it’s going to be bad as well.  Frankly, if you vote according to the two-party system, I’d vote for the Republican this time around as he is about as center as you can get, although he does lean left at times.  What else can you do but vote third party?  If you intend to do that, it’s Ron Paul that I’d vote for, if he decides to go with a third party like Pat B. did in the 90s. 

Yours, Albert

     URGENT NORTH AMERICAN RED ALERT: C-51 Goes to Second Reading

     ”IAHF List: URGENT!! ACT IMMEDIATELY!! See below. This alert just in from Tony Stephan of Truehope Inc. in Alberta Canada. Tony has 8 employees hard at work in an emergency call center from which they’re contacting every health food store in Canada urging emergency assistance to kill the bill from hell: C-51.

     ”No one in Canada or the USA can afford not to help kill this bill. If you are American, please forward this to anyone in Canada who you know, and if you are Canadian, please take action yourself, then download this info and bring it to every health food store within a 25 k radius of your house and urge them to bagstuff the alert and to urge customers to call their MPs to strenuously oppose this. If you don’t you will lose your access to dietary supplements. Keep in mind that the evil Canadian Health Food Assn isn’t helping to kill this bill.”

     Read it here!

Gardasil Meets Measles: A Coincidence? By Barbara Loe Fisher 25 Aug 2008 The bad news about GARDASIL [Gardakill] vaccine keeps getting worse and it was only a matter of time before government health officials promoted an “epidemic” to deflect attention from GARDASIL risks and create an excuse to point accusing fingers at parents who decline to give their children one or more of the 16 federally promoted vaccines. They did the same thing in 1985, when publicity about DPT vaccine reactions prompted officials at the CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics to allege there were whooping cough epidemics in eight states due to parents rejecting DPT.

     Change can be a good thing, for sure, but it can also be a bad one when the hidden things behind the candidate largely remain in the shadows where the general public cannot see them. 

     For example, there is one or two political factions in the US that promote change, such as higher taxes, more legislation that restricts more of our freedoms under the guise of “for the greater good”.

     It’s quite possible that we’ve never seen the full picture behind any candidate, including George Bush, Jr., Bill Clinton, daddy Bush, and maybe even Reagan. 

     Although Reagan openly claimed that he was not a Trilateralist, something that in and of itself was a miracle that he’d even talk about in public, there were times when you had to wonder whether it’s possible that anyone could rise to the position of president without being a handpicked favorite of those who own the gold, including what was once the gold reserve of this nation. 

     Before you jump off a cliff here and elect a man who no one ever heard of before, other than alleged radical leftists and such, be sure that you really know the man and the changes he represents.  This one man has flip-flopped so much on so many issues over the last year that I, Albert, honestly do not know how anyone could possibly feel comfortable in electing him.

     Keith has presented one or two pieces on this man’s past on the Albertaclipper Blog.  There appears to be more questions regarding this largely unknown fellow than answers , including his citizenship.  And then I ask myself the question whether anyone would be so silly as to forget to check something as basic as that.  It’s possible, but it’s not likely, but let’s hope the truth comes out either way before the election.

     One last note… if this presidential hopeful happens to be the socialist/communist that some say he  is, the changes that he intends to brings to America may not be what you expected.  He’s an unknown quantity, despite whatever the media tells you.       

     Please think twice before you throw away your vote on a man who you do not adequately know.

     Your’s, Albert

Paid Advertisement

NSA Security Officer: We Should Just Kill Troublesome Bloggers

     Wayne Madsen, always spoiling for a fight with Bush and Cheney, or the chance to show off his undies to minimum wage airport TSA workers, has an executive level NSA staff person on record saying that significant sentiment exists within the NSA to kill troublesome bloggers and journalists.

     

     When I read things like this I often wonder whether the human race will survive in the long term. Even animals are kinder to one another than many humans are to their own. Where animals usually kill only to survive, man often kills for a variety of causes, none of which makes any sense if you sit down and think it over.

     The issue of the National Security Agency (NSA) adopting a philosophy of killing journalists and bloggers who disagree with their SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) is almost laughable. On the other hand, the idea of individual NSA officers having such an opinion is not so far fetched.

     If you recall, even someone in the administration of President Bill Clinton voiced such a sediment where it comes to troublesome foreign leaders. But does that mean that the Whitehouse itself has adopted such a policy? I think not, but that’s not to say that it hasn’t been done by factions within our government.

     I, Albert, know from experience that many departments and agencies within our government have their left and right components. Agents talk back and forth in and out of school about an assortment of issues involving controversial bloggers and journalists, as well as people such as Alex Jones, who happens to be the conveyor of this latest piece of information. Jones himself is quite a controversial guy. Surely by now the NSA would have done him in if they truly had such a murderous policy.

     I can also tell you from experience that there are those in government who think in such a manner that they view many common Americans as enemies of the State. There are a few Congressmen who have voiced their sediments in public in such a manner that it would appear that they think of themselves as being above the common man, which is entirely counter to what our founding fathers intended.

     Let’s put it this way, anyone who works for government actually works for you and I. We’re the one’s who pay their paycheck. Government earns very little money and so is entirely dependent on taxation based on the income of the American people. If you and I did not pay taxes, they would not have a job. So, because they work for us, we use to call them “public servants”, and so somewhere along the line they forgot their place.

     Everytime such a story comes out, those of us who really care about society and the American way of life understandably end up with a sinking feeling in our guts. There is no way for any of us to know whether Jones’ story is true or not, and so we much keep it in the back of our minds while we continue on down the road of life. If it is true, if NSA is toying with such a policy, and if this could be proven, there is no doubt that most Americans wouldn’t believe it anyway.

     End of story.

     Yours, Albert

More evidence is surfacing now that would indicate that Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible to run for president of the United States on the basis of his foreign birth…

Please click below:

Photo Shows Obama Registered As A Muslim Indonesian Citizen!

WorldNetDaily is a credible news agency, but the brain-dead masses will not accept any negative press about their chosen one. NBC, CBS, ABC, and the majority of the printed news media have all but ordained Mr. Obama as King of the world. Forget about the election process, Obama be their man.

Why are there no red flags waving in regards to Obama’s dubious birth right or his known association with radical black, radical Muslim, and other suspected organizations who have in the past, and are continuing to, funnel money into his political campaign?

Had President Bush and our so-called conservative Republicans in congress not blundered away their conservative principles, the polls would now be showing a wide margin in favor of John McCain. But the true conservatives have shied away from the current D.C. bunch, and sadly, may just stay at home during the November election.

To those conservatives who support the Second Amendment, I offer this little reminder… had it not been for two Supreme Court Justices appointed by G.W. Bush, our individual right to possess a firearm would have been struck down, and likely lost forever! (D.C. Gun Ban Overturned)

To the Christian right, I ask, what chance would we have at putting an end to the murderous practice of abortion if Barack Hussein Obama takes the oath of office? An Obama-appointed Supreme Court will be nothing but a total disaster for all conservatives and will lead to the total destruction of our American way of life.

This phony Messiah MUST BE STOPPED!

Keith

     You know, I really hate it when I buy an unsweetened ice tea at McDonalds and the glass I get is smaller than the one the guy in front of me gets when he buys the sweetened ice tea. I know this sounds really trite, but there’s nothing more that I dislike than to buy an ice tea for a buck and get less than someone who has a sweet tooth.

     We’re told over and over how the US is becoming a nation of fat slobs. The fast fooderies are given a good part of the blame, I suspect McDonalds as well, and yet here they are promoting a sugar laiden drink and they give people more for their buck who buy it than those of us who buy the more responsible unsweetened version.

     What’s up with that?

McDonald’s grows smarter

     There have been a lot of changes at McDonald’s, especially since Skinner stepped in as chief executive in 2004. Even so, the world’s largest fast-food chain is still vilified for its high-calorie menu and not doing more to fight obesity. Having worked at McDonald’s for more than half his life (his first job was in high school), Skinner, 63, bristles at some of the attacks. But even though nutritionists aren’t all that thrilled with McDonald’s, investors certainly are: The stock has doubled in the four years since Skinner took over.

     

     And so one day I asked the lady at the drive-thru window “what’s up with the smaller glass”? Here’s what she told me: “They both hold 32 oz.”

     I almost laughed.

     Yours, Albert

     P.S. By the way, I had a dream this morning in which I was talking to a woman as we walked through a city’s streets to her apartment. As we walked along the once-people-filled streets she commented to me that it’s almost like a ghost town, that during the day when it was once busy with people, now there’s hardly anyone. She said it’s not good for business as she has an apartment to pay for. I did not ask her what her business is, but I could see she was right, there was no one in sight on this typical American street. When I awoke, I was left with a strange feeling that I hope is wrong.

     In the “old days,” we had televisions that weighed a ton, that you wouldln’t even think of throwing out with the trash when something happened to it. In the “old days” we had radios that were built like a battle ship, and that when something bad happened to them we took them to the corner radio television shop to get fixed. In the “old days” just one of our motor cars was made with enough steel to make ten of the vehicles we have today (only a guess now). And in the “old days” when we made $2.45 an hour, we thought we had it made in the shade.

     When you look at that era and you take a close look at today, you have to ask yourself this question, “What happened to the American dream?” Well, perhaps this is the answer to that question…
     Yours, Albert

THE WHOLE WORLD IN (DEBT) GOLD CHAINS

     Out of the welter of discussion and recrimination which has been proceeding on the subject of the economic and social crisis through which the world in general, and this country in particular, is passing, one idea stands out clearly. It is a new idea, and yet it has been, I think, grasped by a majority of the population.

     It is that the crisis, the poverty, and the mental and physical distress which are the features of these present times, are in a certain sense artificial. We are starving in the midst of plenty. It is not goods and services which are lacking-it is the money with which to buy those goods and services which either actually exist or could potentially be made. Money is only a ticket system.

     It would appear that every effort has been made to confuse and obscure this issue. The crisis is described as an unemployment crisis, whereas a little consideration will make it clear that our scientists, our organisers, and our engineers have been engaged for hundreds of years, and successfully engaged in producing this so-called ”unemployment” crisis, which properly considered is, of course, the successful transfer of economic labour from the backs of men on to the backs of machines.

You gotta read it!

EU states broadly back French immigration plan

     CANNES: EU ministers on Monday broadly backed French proposals for a tougher common policy to stem illegal immigration, despite some differences and concerns about accusations of xenophobia from outside the bloc.     France has made harmonising the bloc’s immigration policy a priority of its six-month EU stewardship that began this month. Under its plan, EU states would pledge to boost the fight against illegal migration and expel more illegal migrants, and confirm commitments for a common asylum policy by 2010.     Here’s The Story!

EU backs tough immigration plans

     The European Pact on Immigration and Asylum sets out principles for the EU to manage migration, fight illegal immigration and help development in poor countries that people are leaving or travelling through to get to Europe.     Under the plan, EU nations will tailor legal immigration towards workers or professionals whose skills fit their particular labour needs, favouring those who would stay in their countries long term.Gotta Read This!

     As you can clearly see, I, Albert, and others here in the United States are not alone in our desire to stop illegal immigration into the US. Other nations are having a heck of a time with it just as we are. It appears that Spain has been reluctant to accept the conditions of law proposed by France, apparently because they fear a South American backlash.

     The Economic Times story says, “Spain has been concerned about the angry reaction of South American countries, whose leaders have slammed new EU rules that allow authorities to detain illegal immigrants for up to 18 months and ban them from re-entry for up to five years.”
     As I, Albert, believe that the issue of illegal immigration policy in Europe comes down to who has the biggest sack — those who make policy without regard to terrorist reprisals or those who quite apparently have a small set of glass globes, fearing the bullies of the world and what harm they may do them.

President Dwight Eisenhawer (b1890 d1969)

     People of Western Europe: A landing was made this morning on the coast of France by troops of the Allied Expeditionary Force. This landing is part of the concerted United Nation’s plan for the liberation of Europe, made in conjunction with our great Russian allies…. I call upon all who love freedom to stand with us now. Together we shall achieve victory.

     (broadcast: DDay, June 6, 1944)

     How soon our European brothers forget the position they allowed themselves to get into through appeasement. How soon they’ve forgotten how a largely conservative America came to their rescue. Unfortunately, there’s a liberal faction in the US that continues to chant a mantra based on appeasement and conciliatory inaction in the face of torrents of illegal immigrants crossing our Southern border.     There are those people in positions of wealth and power who have successfully polarized society, both here and abroad, on the issue of illegal immigration. I, Albert, certainly do undestand and can appreciate the desire of anyone from another country wanting to come to the US to start a new life. But this is not a nation up for grabs. It’s a nation of laws and procedures that must be followed before that foreign born person can come here to live.