Posts Tagged ‘U.S. Constitution’

Guns in the Home Found to Deter Homicides

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

| home | welcome | recent work | navigation | mission | about |
| Blog Entry Archive |

Al Colombo's GKO Technology Blog

5 June 2010 –For many years now, the anti-gun lobby has worked furiously to take your gun rights away. Historically speaking, this is not the first time that we’ve seen this kind of effort among both the well intentioned and politically dishonest for even in Thomas Jefferson’s day gun control had become an issue–and this was at a time when firearms was the norm and not the exception in our society.

1 March 2010: Gun Control Today and in Jefferson’s Day

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

Thomas Jefferson, Source: www.great-quotes.com


REPORT CONFIRMS MORE GUNS = LESS CRIME; NO PUBLIC SAFETY THREAT, SAYS SAF
For Immediate Release: 3/24/2010

BELLEVUE, WA – A report published by MSNBC.com confirms “everything gun rights groups have been saying for years, that more armed citizens does not equate to increased violence, and actually coincides with a reduction in homicides,” the Second Amendment Foundation said today.

The on-line news agency this morning released an investigative report that record numbers of American citizens are now legally carrying firearms for personal protection. Yet, the report also reveals that homicide rates have declined dramatically during a period when gun sales have skyrocketed. Further, the report noted that Washington, DC with its extreme gun control has the highest murder rate in the nation, while Utah, with very liberal gun laws, has the lowest rate.

“This is further evidence that everything the gun prohibitionists have been claiming and predicting over the past two decades has been fundamentally fraudulent,” said SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “They have repeatedly argued that more guns will equate to more crime and more firearms deaths, and MSNBC.com just let the air out of their sails with this exhaustive and well-balanced report.”

Gottlieb said the public “has gradually, but steadily come to the realization that the gun ban lobby has built its campaign of citizen disarmament on a mountain of falsehoods, one heaped on top of another.”

“This is why,” he said, “anti-gun groups have lost their momentum and their credibility. They failed to gain traction even with a Democrat-controlled Congress and an anti-gun White House. They are so desperate for attention that they have now declared war on private businesses just to generate publicity. Their high-profile campaign of hysteria against Starbucks for complying with state laws that allow concealed and open carry in their coffee shops is based on an issue they fabricated just to grab headlines and television face time, and the public knows it.

“Every restrictive gun law, every ban, every gun-free-zone they have advocated and defended have one thing in common,” Gottlieb concluded. “They gave us a body count. The MSNBC.com report suggests America has had enough.”

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nations oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. SAF has previously funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, CT; and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners, a lawsuit against the cities suing gun makers and an amicus brief and fund for the Emerson case holding the Second Amendment as an individual right.

Second Amendment Foundation
12500 NE Tenth Place • Bellevue, WA 98005
(425) 454-7012 • FAX (425) 451-3959 • www.saf.org

Send Al Colombo an email.
Click to Email

Copyright©2010
Giant Killers Organization
All Rights Reserved
Use of GKO Materials

Al’s Views: The Bill of Rights (those who rule should run)

Monday, March 15th, 2010

| home | welcome | recent work | navigation | mission | about |
| Blog Entry Archive |

Al Colombo's GKO Tech Blog

March 15, 2010 — It would behoove those who have never really sat down and read our Bill of Rights to do so. The Bill of Rights is actually the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which is the guiding principles upon which this nation is founded.

If you notice, I said is founded rather than was founded. This is because any Constitution is intended to be the fundamental guide by which all laws and actions are performed by the legislators that run the country. The Bill of Rights is part of the underpinnings of this nation and should be adhered to no matter whether it’s been 225 years or 400 years.

If you noticed, I did not use the word RULE in the paragraph above, but rather RUN. This is because far too many legislators in the United States have the idea that they actually RULE as in a dictatorship. Oh, they may rule for a time, but the people of this nation, once they figure out what the deal is will put a stop to that Congressman’s ruler-ship.

We The People
REMEMBER, the masses are only ruled by consent, and this is why it’s taken this long for the hard left that’s now in office to get even this far. They’ve bent the rules and trashed the Constitution at every turn.

What they’ve also done is to suggest that our Constitution and Bill of Rights are “living documents” that can be changed at the drop of a hat. This is not what our founding fathers intended–it’s not true, never was, and never will be. Don’t believe them, they speak with forked tongue.

My advice is, if you’re a Congressman and you want to rule a nation, go to Russia or the United Kingdom, but please stay out of Washington. We have enough of you for one country to deal with.

Limiting Federal Powers, a Necessity Then as Now
And finally, the intent of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is to limit federal powers against the states. It defines these limitations by also defining state and citizen rights.

A good example of this is Amendment 2 where it says: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. It’s simple, plain to the point, and very easy to understand. More than that, the early settlers and pioneers had to have weapons to survive. Even as a child I can remember that the accepted intent of this amendment is to guarantee our right to own and bear arms.

The very idea that citizens are not entitled to bear arms is false. Not only is it false, but those in position of leadership who would have you believe otherwise should be looked upon with suspicion. What other motives can any legislator have in this regard but that of tyranny and hardship for their citizens?

Why would any legislator seek to eliminate the 2nd Amendment other than they have something in mind that they know the people of this nation will not appreciate? Their effort to disarm us is merely an effort to assure their own safety when that time comes. Wake up, read the Bill of Rights, and then tell your Congressmen in both parties to follow our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Bill of Rights

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Send me an e-Mail

Copyright©2010
Giant Killers Organization
All Rights Reserved
Use of GKO Materials

Is Obama Kenyan Born? Is This a Smoking Gun?

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

| home | welcome | recent work | navigation | mission | about |
| Blog Entry Archive |

Al Colombo's GKO Technology Blog

The following is part of a website called the “Way Back Machine” at www.archive.org/web/web.php. As far as I can see, this is a legitimate story, but if anyone has any further info, please pass it on to me.

The question now is, what else can Obama supporters say that will counter this story? If there’s one smoking gun, there must be more. I have a feeling that no one will say anything now. What they will do is ignore us altogether. But will YOU, the People of this country allow them to do that? Will you force them to observer our own established laws, laws that were put in place more than 200 years ago. –Al Colombo


Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.


For more information on this billboard, click here.

Send Al Colombo an e-Mail

Copyright©2009
Giant Killers Organization
All Rights Reserved
Use of GKO Materials

Rep. Trent Franks: Obama Should Release Long-Form Birth Certificate

Saturday, October 3rd, 2009

| home | welcome | recent work | navigation | mission | about |

Al Colombo's GKO Technology Blog

The Washington Independent, 9/28/09
According to Trent Franks, “Probably, Barack Obama could solve this problem and make the birthers, you know, back off, by simply showing us his long-form birth certificate. That’d solve the problem. There’s some other issue, I don’t know what it is, that he doesn’t want people to see the birth certificate on.”

Here’s a video of Trent Franks talking about this. He has a lot of incentives NOT to endorse a full investigation of the Obama birth certificate issue, as he admits to on this video. Frankly, the only reason I can think of that would make me NOT produce my long version is something that might hurt my chances for the presidency.

I ask you, what else can it be?

Click to contact Al Colombo

Copyright©2009
Giant Killers Organization
All Rights Reserved
Use of GKO Materials

The Importance of Obama’s Birth Certificate

Saturday, October 3rd, 2009

| home | welcome | recent work | navigation | mission | about |

Al Colombo's GKO Technology Blog

As most of you know, there’s a question whether our current president was truly born in the United States. This sitting president, President Obama, has spent considerable money in an effort not to produce a birth certificate.

The reason why this is so important is that our own Constitution requires that any sitting president be native born to America. If our Constitution is to mean anything, that law and all others need to be followed.

Under Article II, is says: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

President Obama stated in his first book that he ran across his birth certificate. Why won’t he just produce it? We all know the reason why most people would do this… but is it the same in this situation?

Send Al Colombo an email.
Click to Email

Copyright©2009
Giant Killers Organization
All Rights Reserved
Use of GKO Materials

Why You Should Support Your Local Militia

Friday, August 14th, 2009

| home | welcome | recent work | navigation | mission | about |

Al Colombo's GKO Tech Blog

EDITOR’s NOTE: This is taken from the National Security forum on FireNetOnline.com

Those of you who know me well, know that I’m a firm believer in the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I’m equally loyal to our Founder’s Declaration of Independence as it clearly states the infractions under which the people of this nation had to suffer prior to the Revolutionary War which won our freedom and right to exist as a separate nation.

Guns have always been a main part of American’s lives, from the beginning of this nation until now. All along you can point to two reasons for this: 1) early on for food, and 2) for protection. Today, we can buy our food in a grocery store, and I’m okay with that. However, today as in the past, guns continue to provide personal protection, not only from animals in the countryside, and not only from threats brought about by criminals, but also from gov’ts that, for one reason or another, decide to attack the good people of these United States of America.

Be the threat foreign or domestic, guns right from the start were intended to act as a deterrent to those who would otherwise usurp the rights and freedoms wrought by the Constitution and Bill of Rights; and judging from some of the dialogue going on in Washington over the past decade or two, I have to admit that the threat right now looks to be domestic.

Our founding fathers knew that this would happen one day. They did everything they could to prevent it by instituting a Republic form of gov’t. However, they also knew that powerful men would one day seek full power and control over the lives of U.S. citizens. Today, you are seeing the citizen militia being called a domestic terrorist threat where in the past our local militia groups were looked upon with respect, at least in Heartland America.

We’ve had local militia groups in these parts since I can remember. These men and women practiced their survival and shooting skills periodically so they could be of service if a foreign power sought to attack the U.S., and that was when most of our active and reserve components were stateside. Today more than ever, guns in the hands of responsible citizens is an absolute must because of so many base closings and troop movement out of country.

When you hear any group vilify your citizen militia, you need to sit back and wonder why they would do this. Recently the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) came out with a report that says the militia are coming back. Hey, they never left. Yes, there were more than 900 more militia groups form during 2008, but when you look at the extremely radical stance taking place in Washington these days, you should be able to understand that more and more main stream Americans have become concerned.

The SPLC and other groups connected to Washington also compare our citizen militia groups to white supremacists but this is absolutely not true in 99.9% of all cases. How do I know? Because there are militia groups out there who have Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, and others that white supremacists would never allow in their orgs.

I’m writing this so as to let you know that for the past two decades I have deliberately conversed with militia. I’m not a member myself as I do not belong to many groups. But I want you to know that you could very well have militia members working right next to you and you would never know it. Most militia members are peace loving people who would never cause a fight, but they will do all they can to end one when they are attacked.

Please do not believe everything you read or hear coming out of the main stream press and networks. Do not believe everything that politically connected groups and individuals say about our citizen militia. There is an agenda and it’s not designed to serve your needs but those of a select few. Even those who work to promote these agendas, the man on the street in the trenches if you will, you hold no special position with the individuals and groups behind this leftist agenda, and in the finale you will be very disappointed for having assisted them. My message to you is bail now while you can still do it.

It may not seem that a post like this has any business being on this FNO network, but the subject matter here involves the security of every man, woman, and child in the United States. Please be loyal to your country, to your fellow citizens, and to your posterity.

Al Colombo
_________________
Allan B. Colombo is Director of FireNetOnline & Security Mission and a technical writer in the Security and life-safety markets. P/330-956-9003 al.colombo@tpromo2.com


Click to Email

Copyright©2009
Giant Killers Organization
All Rights Reserved
Use of GKO Materials

Patrick Henry: Something Worth Dieing For

Saturday, July 4th, 2009

| home | welcome | recent work | navigation | mission | about |

Al Colombo's GKO Tech Blog

Patrick Henry would never endorse A “One-World Harmonious Governing Body,” so why should we?

04 July 2009: Give me Liberty or Give me Death

“It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace– but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”

Patrick Henry, Give me Liberty or Give me Death, March 23, 1775

When I read Patrick Henry’s speech given on March 23, 1775, I am in awe of the enormous size of the task that rose before our Founding Fathers. I’m struck by their forward vision, their ability to understand that there are things in this life worth dieing for, and liberty was one of them. Can you and I say the same as to our own resolve toward freedom and liberty?

Patrick asked his fellow countrymen a simple question that would be good to ask everyone in America today: “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?”

You see, the “powers that be” of that time, just as in ours, offered the trade, peace and security in exchange for high taxation and limited freedom. Patrick’s thought on this matter was simple and to the point: “Forbid it, Almighty God!” And hence his most famous quote that resounds today with great meaning and hope, not only for those of us living at this time, but for those yet to come: “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”

Give me liberty or give me death was one of hundreds of wonderful quotes taught to past generations of Americans. English books (the old english readers) had in them wonderful stories of our nation’s past–our nation’s heros.

Patriotism & National Pride Often Omitted
I dare say that our children and grandchildren are not afforded the same luxury of hearing those patriotic, awe-inspiring sayings that you and I were allowed. Why? To what purpose have they been denied? Perhaps it’s not so far removed that “people” with questionable motives have sought to suppress the concept of nationanlism and patriotism, and hence we’ve been taught that there is nothing worth dieing for.

To what purpose would any group work toward the elimination of both nationalism and a willingness to die for a just cause? Perhaps because they intend to create a single, harmonious, one-world governing body where each nation state (country) becomes but an extension of the center core, in this case the United Nations.

I ask you, did you vote on the issue of the United States Gov’t becoming an extension of a one-world gov’t? Did we miss a national vote on the harmonization of laws with that of Europe? When we voted for “change” in the last national election, did we realize that the changes that this president intended involved the creation of a socialist state?

Patrick Henry and all the Founding Fathers of this nation would never go along with any of this, so why do you and I? The question is, how do we effectively stop it without causing a modern day armed insurrection? The one thing our Founding Fathers did was to provide us with an out. Yes, they foresaw the time when our gov’t would become hostile to its people (you and I) and they provided for our right as a people to remove that gov’t in order to institute one that will obey our Constitution and Bill of Rights, rather than twist and distort it, which is exactly what has happened.

Our forefathers were a passionate and brave people. You can tell that in their writings. The courts may twist and distort their writings as they wish, but we who care and who read their words know that they were patriotic and that they provided the means whereby we should be able to protect ourselves, and that is through the Bill of Rights.

Read the following Declaration of Indepenence, written before this nation became the United States of America. You could almost apply their complaints and reasons for revolution into what’s happening today. Let’s hope we can resolve this problem before it comes to a clash of arms.

The Declaration of Independence
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

Copyright©2009
Giant Killers Organization
All Rights Reserved
Use of GKO Materials